Your opinion & share...
Latest topics
Search
Who is online?
In total there are 36 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 36 Guests None
Most users ever online was 387 on Tue Dec 05, 2023 7:35 pm
Moderators & partners
Most Viewed Topics
Statistics
We have 5933 registered usersThe newest registered user is Skylines3
Our users have posted a total of 47490 messages in 4938 subjects
Top posting users this week
No user |
Recommendations
• The FREE hand reading services at the Modern Hand Reading Forum are being continued in 2019 with the assistance of Google adsense!
MAJOR HAND READING SYNONYMS
Palmistry, Palm Reading, Hand Analysis, Chirology & Chiromancy. Learn how to read hands according the Modern Hand Reading paradigm & you can use this forum as your palm reading guide!
Visions for the starting point of the Heartline
+3
Lynn
Parender
Magda van Dijk-Rijneke
7 posters
Modern Hand Reading Forum - Discover the language of your hands: palm reading & palmistry forum! :: III - MODERN HAND READING - Various systems for reading hands! :: IIIa - Modern Palmistry: general topics, questions
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Visions for the starting point of the Heartline
Manfred wrote:... But it's quite different if we read the heart line chronologically, what Cheiro doesn't and I don't know if Benham does though he shows a heart line time scale in his "Scientific hand reading...".
Hi Manfred,
When authors present a time-scale for a line, it is obvious that they read the line chronologically. Benham has indeed presented a time-scale for the heart line in his 'The Benham Book of Palmistry'.
It is very obvious that William G. Benham read the heart line in the reversed order that you are using today - though, he used it probably with exactly the same purpose that you have in mind with your approach.
Actually, I don't understand the basis your doubts about how he used his model. Can you explain your doubts? (I see no argument to put any doubt about how Benham used his timing-model for the heart line)
Nevertheles, yes, I can confirm what you described about Cheiro's work regarding this topic. Cheiro indeed talked about the same starting point for the heart line, without talking about any time scale.
However, Cheiro also used this approach beyond 'characterology', because he e.g. talks about signs resulting from influences of people. However, it is obvious that Cheiro only applies his 'system of seven' to the life line and fate line - which he obviously considered as most important in the perspective of timing.
I guess the implication of his work is that Cheiro's work doesn't support the idea that 'timing' can be applied to the heart line and the head line.
PS. Manfred, not sure what you have in mind regarding "... a great difference between the early embyonic developement and a child after birth".
These words sound a bit that you simply want to exclude the embryological argument from this discussion - via a theological statement regarding the soul....? Be aware: consciousness is by principle a matter of definition, but I think abortion laws indicate that conscious is likely to start manifesting even months before birth. I am quite sure that the 'pro-life movement' would give many arguments to confirm this!
Also, maybe even more importance:
Please be aware that the embryological observations actually provide a basis for Benham & Cheiro's innovative approaches regarding the starting point of the heart line!!!
Re: Visions for the starting point of the Heartline
Dear Martijn,
about Benham:
- He shows a heart line scale but at no place an excample of use or evedence on base of a case of study.
- One more again: There are very curious excamples of heart lines in his book (Nr.: 34 - 47 in the chapter about the heart line).
It's not possible for me to repeat the same discussion - for excample about the embryonic and born child state - in all the needed depth again.
The simple question of Magda went in the direction:
What are our practical experience and way of use. Above there is my answer.
If I'm allowed to give any advice to a hand reader that is looking for it: Instead of trusting numbers, ideas or findings of someone, trust what lasts on base of your own life reading experience.
Regards
Manfred
about Benham:
- He shows a heart line scale but at no place an excample of use or evedence on base of a case of study.
- One more again: There are very curious excamples of heart lines in his book (Nr.: 34 - 47 in the chapter about the heart line).
It's not possible for me to repeat the same discussion - for excample about the embryonic and born child state - in all the needed depth again.
The simple question of Magda went in the direction:
What are our practical experience and way of use. Above there is my answer.
If I'm allowed to give any advice to a hand reader that is looking for it: Instead of trusting numbers, ideas or findings of someone, trust what lasts on base of your own life reading experience.
Regards
Manfred
Re: Visions for the starting point of the Heartline
Manfred wrote:about Benham
- He shows a heart line scale but at no place an excample of use or evedence on base of a case of study.
- One more again: There are very curious excamples of heart lines in his book (Nr.: 34 - 47 in the chapter about the heart line).
Manfred, what you described in the quote are just observations - but do they really matter for this topic?
I believe that it is usually quite easy to point out to elements that are not presented in a book. However, not sure that one can use that as a valid argument to support ones own view.
And yes of course: everybody is very welcome to share their experience.
But if you think that other authors (or discussion partners at this forum) have been using poor / unfair / misleading / unrealistic arguments, then I would appreciate if you try to point that out by detail.
(Sorry, I am also skepdic regarding your second argument about Benham: I don't see how Benham's drawn pictures could disqualify his 'tming'-model for the heart line.)
Anyway, I hope that my critical feedback will help you to find/formulate stronger arguments that might support your vision much more.
PS. I know your time is limited. But I wonder: do you have shared more arguments in other topics at this forum? - If so, it would be helpful to simply present a link to that topic or preferably the post where you shared your other arguments.
Re: Visions for the starting point of the Heartline
Manfred wrote:
If I'm allowed to give any advice to a hand reader that is looking for it: Instead of trusting numbers, ideas or findings of someone, trust what lasts on base of your own life reading experience.
Regards
Manfred
Patti- Posts : 3912
Join date : 2010-07-24
Re: Visions for the starting point of the Heartline
Dear Matrijn,
I'm bearing your "critical" arguments very much I hope you'll do it too, if I'll stop here my constibution.
Regards
Manfred
I'm bearing your "critical" arguments very much I hope you'll do it too, if I'll stop here my constibution.
Regards
Manfred
Re: Visions for the starting point of the Heartline
Personally I think the radial side of the heart line is influenced by the movement capabilities, structure, and position preferences of the thumb and index finger in early development as well as throughout life.
The only movement that directly influences the ulnar side is the tension and movement of the little finger. There is no counter pulling or pushing from the rest of the ulna side until the wrist.
The Suwon crease is supposedly a crease that forms after birth and into very early childhood. This is a crease that appears to form radially and move toward the ulnar side to touch the heart line.
As Martijn pointed out somewhere recently, the heart line first appears radially. The hand as it develops does so in an uneven fashion so that certain parts of the hands are ahead in their development and some parts are trailing behind. This is normal. And in normally developing hands, the ulnar side, little finger and even the thumb on the radial side are last in completing development while the index to ring fingers are more advanced.
(Martijn shared this image in 2002)
Kiwihands shared the images recently of a woman whose heart line was very thin in appearance on the ulnar side of the hand. In the silhouette on the side you can see an indentation so the heart line does continue around the side.
The only movement that directly influences the ulnar side is the tension and movement of the little finger. There is no counter pulling or pushing from the rest of the ulna side until the wrist.
The Suwon crease is supposedly a crease that forms after birth and into very early childhood. This is a crease that appears to form radially and move toward the ulnar side to touch the heart line.
As Martijn pointed out somewhere recently, the heart line first appears radially. The hand as it develops does so in an uneven fashion so that certain parts of the hands are ahead in their development and some parts are trailing behind. This is normal. And in normally developing hands, the ulnar side, little finger and even the thumb on the radial side are last in completing development while the index to ring fingers are more advanced.
(Martijn shared this image in 2002)
Kiwihands shared the images recently of a woman whose heart line was very thin in appearance on the ulnar side of the hand. In the silhouette on the side you can see an indentation so the heart line does continue around the side.
Patti- Posts : 3912
Join date : 2010-07-24
Re: Visions for the starting point of the Heartline
Good informative discussion
rajeevkrsharmaji- Posts : 330
Join date : 2015-12-23
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Headline/heartline
» the heartline- emotions & love
» Fate, Genetics and Free Will/Environment
» Headline Starting Under Lifeline on Lower Mars
» Heart line origin point confusion.....
» the heartline- emotions & love
» Fate, Genetics and Free Will/Environment
» Headline Starting Under Lifeline on Lower Mars
» Heart line origin point confusion.....
Modern Hand Reading Forum - Discover the language of your hands: palm reading & palmistry forum! :: III - MODERN HAND READING - Various systems for reading hands! :: IIIa - Modern Palmistry: general topics, questions
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Mon Mar 18, 2024 2:43 pm by rajashri
» Can anyone read it for me?
Tue Nov 28, 2023 9:28 am by Jazyrider
» Square on Marriage line
Sat Jun 03, 2023 12:25 am by pp38000
» Cross in mount Jupiter
Sun May 21, 2023 2:52 pm by greatbear
» clinodactyly: top phalanges bending towards Mercury finger
Sun May 21, 2023 1:28 pm by greatbear
» Can anybody please read this hand
Wed May 03, 2023 6:42 pm by greatbear
» Nisha Ghai
Mon Sep 26, 2022 12:43 pm by mihsaaskhan
» Absolutely non-sense career till now
Wed Jul 20, 2022 9:15 pm by mrhandsome
» Fate Destiny Line -
Sat Jan 01, 2022 3:21 pm by Stefania
» VIII - Palmistry books TOP 100 - listed by 'Amazon Sales Rank'!
Wed Dec 29, 2021 10:34 am by Magda van Dijk-Rijneke
» Stewart Culin - Palmistry in China and Japan
Mon Sep 13, 2021 6:53 am by Stijn
» Herbert Giles - Palmistry in China
Thu Sep 09, 2021 10:20 am by Stijn
» life line forks
Wed Jun 16, 2021 11:54 am by Stijn
» Astro-Palmistry files
Sun May 30, 2021 1:17 pm by Stijn
» unique lines on Saturn mount
Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:21 am by rashmi_rh